Funny Video Forex Gadget Hi-tech

Funny Video Forex Gadget Hi-tech

Archive for the ‘San Francisco’ Category

Location Will Be This Year’s Twitter At SXSW

Posted by Giggi On February - 26 - 2010

We’re two weeks away from the SXSW Interactive, a drinking festival with a side of tech that takes place each year in Austin, Texas (before the larger SXSW film and music portions). While the conference itself is interesting, more interesting is usually the “next big thing” that comes out of it. And I think I already know what it will be this year. Three years ago, Twitter famously was the talk of the conference (it won the web award that year). While sure, it didn’t explode into mainstream popularity until sometime later, the writing was on the wall for the early-adopters who started using it there or shortly thereafter. Two years ago, it was arguably Twitter again that was the must-use service throughout the conference as it continued to mature. But last year saw some new entries rise. Both Foursquare and Gowalla launched at the conference, with Foursquare gaining much of the momentum coming out of the conference (as some of us predicted ). And this year, I suspect it will be largely an extension of that, with location services in general being the talk of the show. Based on what I’ve been hearing, basically at the major players in the location-based space have big things planned for this year’s SXSW. Foursquare hopes to have a new, completely overhauled version of its iPhone app ready for the event this year. They are also likely to have a huge batch of new badges for people to collect throughout the week. Meanwhile, Gowalla has a large event of its own, complete with special VIP access if you use the service throughout the conference. The SXSW conference is also highlighting the Austin-based Gowalla as a key tool on its own pages. A newer startup, Plancast (started by TechCrunch alum Mark Hendrickson think “ Foursquare For The Future “), has already put together a helpful unofficial SXSW guide surrounding events during the conference (and actually events for those who aren’t attending too). They also hope to have their iPhone app ready in time for the conference. Meanwhile, both Twitter’s and SimpleGeo’s plans are still largely unknown at this point, but both are planning big things, we hear. Twitter could use the event to launch its ad platform , and CEO Evan Williams is giving the keynote on Monday. And then, of course, there is Facebook. While they’re sniffing around Loopt right now, could they use the conference to talk a bit more about their location plans? If all these other services start getting a ton of buzz during the conference, they might have to. Of course, all of this is assuming that AT&T supplies any service whatsoever this year. Last year, the network was completely overloaded until the final two days after the telecom giant scrambled to up their bandwidth (and even then it was only marginally better). They promised that failure would never happen again (people in San Francisco in New York City may have something to say about that), so we’ll see this year. If AT&T fails again, it could really hurt a lot of these location-based services, many of which are heavily predicated around the iPhone. Otherwise, this is going to be location’s year at SXSW. CrunchBase Information Foursquare Gowalla Twitter Plancast SimpleGeo Facebook Information provided by CrunchBase

cb410b6d1234 pm.png 112x150 Location Will Be This Years Twitter At SXSW

View post:
Location Will Be This Years Twitter At SXSW

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — One of Alaska’s most eroded villages wants to revive a lawsuit that claims greenhouse gasses from oil, power and coal companies are to blame for the climate change endangering the tiny community. The city of Kivalina and a federally recognized tribe, the Alaska Native village of Kivalina, filed the case in federal court in San Francisco in 2008, but it was dismissed in October. Now they’re appealing to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, with their opening brief due March 11. Oil giants Exxon Mobil Corp. and BP PLC are among two dozen defendants named in the lawsuit. Representatives for the two companies declined to comment Thursday. “These are matters for the courts,” said Rob Young, an Exxon spokesman. “We supported the original decision.” Kivalina’s attorney, Matt Pawa of suburban Boston, said the plaintiffs want monetary damages to help with the estimated $400 million cost to relocate the northwest Alaska village. Residents have chosen a relocation site, an area known as Kiniktuuraq, about two miles southeast of the current location. Kivalina is a traditional Inupiat Eskimo community of about 390 people about 625 miles northwest of Anchorage. It’s built on an 8-mile barrier reef between the Kivalina River and Chukchi Sea. Sea ice historically protected the village, whose economy is based in part on salmon fishing plus subsistence hunting of whale, seal, walrus, and caribou. But the ice is forming later and melting sooner because of higher temperatures, and that has left it unprotected from fall and winter storm waves and surges that pummel coastal communities. “The village is being wiped out by global warming and needs to move urgently before it is destroyed and the residents become global warming refugees,” Pawa said. “It’s battered by winter storms and if residents don’t get some money to move, the village will cease to exist.” In dismissing the case, the court said one of the factors in the decision hinged on the question of whether anyone could ever demonstrate the “causal effect” of global warming as an injury, according to Pawa. “We’re appealing on the grounds the district court was incorrect,” he said. Damage to Kivalina from global warming has been documented in official reports by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the General Accounting Office, Pawa said. The lawsuit accuses some of the defendants of a conspiracy to mislead the public regarding the causes and consequences of climate change. The lawsuit invokes the federal common law of public nuisance. Every entity that contributes to the pollution problem harming Kivalina is liable, according to Pawa. The lawsuit was filed in California because that’s where many of the defendants do business. More on Climate Change

See original here:
Kivalina Appeals: Eroding Alaska Village Appeals Lawsuit’s Dismissal, Blames Corporations For Climate Change

Flurry, a mobile app analytics company, has noticed approximately 50 devices in the Cupertino that match the characteristics of Apple’s tablet device. Flurry claims to have reliably placed these devices on Apple’s Cupertino campus, and are confident that they are “observing a group of pre-release tablets in testing.” This make sense – as the Apple Tablet has to be tested before it is announced this Wednesday, January 27 in San Francisco. Furthermore, Flurry has been an extremely reliable source on analytics data thus far and don’t often break stories unless they are sure they’ve checked their facts. They’ve noticed that a large number of the apps downloaded were Games (140 total downloads or launches) and the next group was Entertainment, followed by News and Books. Here’s a chart of the usage data:

9fb538538f215x81.jpg 150x56 Breaking: Flurry Notices Cupertino based Users Testing Apps on Apple Tablet

More here:
Breaking: Flurry Notices Cupertino-based Users Testing Apps on Apple Tablet

The Bay Area News Project, a non-profit media organization providing hyper local news to the San Francisco area, has announced a deal to provide news to the New York Times. The content will be used for The New York Times’ local San Francisco editions on Friday and Saturday. The deal with the New York Times has been rumored to be in negotiations but was officially announced today. The project, which was announced last year, has received $5 million in funding from financier Warren Hellman. The site, which has a staff of nearly 30 journalists, is also supported by KQED-FM (Though it appears that deal has ended ) and University of California, Berkeleys graduate school of journalism. The Project as also brought on former McKinsey partner Lisa Frazier as CEO and Jonathan Weber, the co-founder and editor in chief of The Industry Standard, as the site’s editor in chief. The New York Times has a similar arrangement in Chicago with the nonprofit Chicago News Cooperative, a similar organization in theory to the Bay Area News Project. The Times recently made waves after announcing a new metered billing system yesterday. The exact details of the plan are unclear and its questionable whether the controversial move will actually bring revenue into the publication.

04f8e3d4d8bay.jpg 150x18 Bay Area News Project Strikes Content Deal With The New York Times

Read this article:
Bay Area News Project Strikes Content Deal With The New York Times

STOCKTON, Calif. — Stockton hardly looks like the most miserable city in the country. But the statistics and stories over the last two years make a case that it is: Since the housing crisis began, this inland port city 80 miles east of San Francisco has had one of the worst foreclosure rates in the country – for most of the time, the worst. At the height of it, about 1 in 10 houses fell to foreclosure. Houses that sold for more than $500,000 before the crash now go for $200,000. In some neighborhoods, fixer-uppers cost less than a new Honda Fit – under $20,000. To spend time in Stockton, a plain-jane city of single-family home neighborhoods edged by freeways and lingering farms, is to begin to understand the calamitous effects of the nation’s foreclosure crisis, which has devastated so many once-booming places. Stockton is the San Joaquin County seat. And according to the Associated Press Economic Stress Index, a month-by-month scoring of U.S. counties’ rates of unemployment, bankruptcy and foreclosures, San Joaquin had a score of 23.55 in November, making it the fourth-most stressed of counties with a population over 25,000. Its foreclosure rate of 6 percent was exceeded only by metro Las Vegas, metro Fort Myers, Fla., metro Orlando, Merced County, Calif., and Kendall County, Ill. An outsider might not notice immediately how Stockton has suffered. It boasts a downtown mall, a mix of handsome, century-old and modern architecture, a new sports stadium, even a promenade overlooking the city’s canal. But two years into the housing crisis, Stockton is a changed place. Whole neighborhoods have been decimated by the mortgage disaster. The tax base has shrunken. City services and municipal jobs have been cut. Unemployment hovers at about 16 percent. Economists predict it will take years for Stockton to recover from the housing bust. Locals say the same about the city’s reputation. Since the housing meltdown began, journalists from around the world have parachuted in to see the city felled by sub-prime mortgages, which enticed new homeowners priced out of the San Francisco Bay area with low interest rates that reset to levels they could not afford. “Welcome to Foreclosureville, U.S.A.” wrote the Los Angeles Times. “America’s Most Miserable City,” declared the London Independent. That headline was inspired by Forbes’ “most miserable cities” index, which ranked Stockton No. 1. City officials say they fully expect Stockton to shake the title in 2010 (it’s recently dropped to No. 4 or 5). But how far away from the top can it go? The population of 290,400 is strapped. Up to two-thirds of homeowners owe more on their properties than the houses are now worth. Housing values have dropped more than 60 percent since the height of the boom four years ago, more than any other city. Housing developments built for commuters have been hit the hardest, since they were the ones to attract newcomers fleeing the huge spike in prices closer to the Bay area. Those whose livelihoods depend on a healthy housing environment – real estate brokers, contractors, day laborers – are barely holding on here. Probably the happiest people are the ones scooping up foreclosures. Speculators are back, of course, but the other bargain hunters include people who only dreamed of being able to afford a house. They’re now living the dream in Stockton. By the time the whole foreclosure phenomenon is done, Stockton may well look less like the bedroom community for commuters to the Bay Area that it was becoming and more like the working-class, immigrant community ringed by Central Valley farm country that it was before. For now, residents just hope the worst is over. ___ The heart of Foreclosureville, U.S.A. – the Stockton subdivision that had more bank repossessions than any other place in the country for much of the last two years – is starting to look like its old self again. The “For Sale” signs that overwhelmed Weston Ranch are mostly gone, and the lawns where weeds grew like corn stalks are shorn. Foreclosure businesses that sprang up, including one that spray-painted brown lawns green and another that offered a foreclosure bus tour, have folded. Every time a foreclosure hits the market, bargain hunters snap it up. But looks are deceiving. In Weston Ranch, financial devastation struck like a natural disaster and the ground has not yet settled. Speculators are buying houses to rent out. On streets where everyone knew everyone, no one knows anyone. Orlando Mixon and his family – wife, son and daughter – are typical Weston Ranch settlers. They moved here eight years ago from Union City, east of San Francisco, after a search for an affordable house sent them farther and farther down the freeway. In those boom times, the Mixons paid $175,000 for a new four-bedroom, three bath split-level, more than they would have paid just five days earlier. But they were excited. They didn’t know Stockton, but the subdivision of 5,000 homes was like a town unto itself, built for easy access to and from a long commute. Beige and boxy, the houses made up in size what they lacked in style. Now, the Mixons are hanging on by their fingers. Their house, they think, is worth just over $200,000, though some on the next street sold recently for $150,000. Still, with two mortgages, they owe more than that (they won’t say how much). Until last month, Mixon spent four months out of work, pushing the family toward financial ruin. “I try not to think about that,” Mixon said. He spoke while washing his blackened work clothes in the driveway: He now works on an oil rig in Los Angeles when there is work, drives the 340 miles every other week to his job, seven days on, seven off. His wife Sharon’s commute is 60 miles each way, five days a week in rush hour traffic, for her job as a manager in a hospital in Hayward. Stockton residents on average commute 46 miles each way. ___ The biggest bargain in Stockton stands on a street most people would choose to avoid. Old men drinking from bottles in brown paper bags lean against an empty brick building. Younger ones loiter on the corners, wearing puffy parkas, selling … something. Rudy Willey, a real estate broker who knows his turf, had had no great expectations for the house. But the property was worse than he had imagined: more like a package store than a single-family home. It had no land, no porch, no stoop. Squatters had had their way with the place. Its small, low-ceilinged rooms looked lopsided. All the fixtures were gone. The bathroom, the kitchen – the whole place – needed a do-over. “$15,000?” Willey said, locking the front door. “I think they’re asking too much.” He smiled at the irony of it. Twenty-seven years of selling real estate in Stockton had not fully prepared him for what has happened to his city, his vocation and his livelihood. At 58, nearing retirement, or so he thought, Willey is working twice as hard and making half as much as he did two years ago. In two months, he has taken just two days off. Not three years ago, Willey couldn’t keep up with the demand for half-million-dollar starter homes springing up within a 30-mile radius of Stockton. Commuters were buying in; locals were trading up. Having seen his share of boom and bust cycles, Willey knew the times were too good to last. A wave of selling in Elk Grove, a town half an hour away that had been the fastest growing in the country in 2007, became a sign. “When I saw the ‘For Sale’ signs, I thought: ‘Something’s happening,’” Willey said. “I thought we were due for a correction – maybe a 15 percent drop.” Now, Willey is selling houses for less than half of what they sold for then. Even so, it is harder to close a deal. A few brokers have acquired most of the foreclosure listings. Most no longer take phone calls to hear offers. Half the time, they don’t return e-mails. In some cases, Willey suspects the broker simply does not want to share a commission. Time to work on a Plan B: Willey is taking a multimedia course at San Joaquin Delta College, a two-year school where he also teaches real estate classes. He hopes to start a Web site. At night, he works on a book, a guide for would-be homebuyers. And each day, he tries to look on the bright side. On an afternoon’s outing to see houses below $35,000, he kept remarking on the “wonderful opportunities” working people have to own a home. “Not bad, not bad,” he said, going through an $18,000 house that had decent bones. It was in a homely neighborhood of aging bungalows. But there were no drug dealers on the corners. “Redone,” Willey said, “this could be a nice little home.” ___ Among all the bargains in Stockton, Jason Ramey had his heart set on one. It was not on the market yet. But on its window and door was the sign of the times: an eviction notice. This was early 2009, the height of Stockton’s foreclosure boom. More than 90 percent of the houses for sale in the city were foreclosures or short sales – where the lender lets borrowers sell a property for less than they owe on it, forgiving the balance, to avoid foreclosure. Ramey, a 31-year-old insurance agent, knew what he wanted. He had been looking at real estate listings for years. But when the market was high, he could not afford to buy. Even “shacks,” as he likes to say, cost $300,000 – well above his price range. Then came the housing disaster, and opportunity. Ramey began scouting houses on the San Joaquin County foreclosure listings. As soon as he saw The One, a corner property in a coveted new development, he decided to wait for it. The house had an arched entrance that reminded Ramey of a French chalet. Neighbors showed pride of place – planting rose gardens, flowering fruit trees, dooryard bougainvillea. It wasn’t as big as other foreclosures in the mid-$200,000 range. But Ramey, a local boy, knows Stockton inside and out. This house had location, location, location, besides its four bedrooms, three baths. This was a place where he could see staking roots, growing a family. Ramey waited four months for the house to come on the market. Meanwhile, he and his girlfriend took a real estate class for first-time homebuyers. Their instructor: Rudy Willey. He taught them how to research properties, find the right mortgage, make a deal. The very morning the house showed up on the real estate listing site he’d been checking every day, Ramey called Willey. “We put an offer in that night,” Ramey said, smiling widely, then adding: “Sure enough, our offer was accepted.” They bought the house, which had sold for more than $500,000 three years earlier, for $233,000. “Every day, we can’t wait to get home,” Ramey said, while giving a tour of the house. Everything in it, stainless steel appliances, tile floors, paint, looked brand spanking new. A koi pond and above-ground pool shared space in the backyard with magnolia trees and hibiscus plants. The family that lost that house had put love and money into it. Ramey said the solar panels – which have cut their utility bills to $30 from $250 when they were renting – were appraised at over $100,000. “You hear all these horrible stories,” Ramey said. “There are so many other aspects to this. This market, the way it is, gave us the opportunity to live the American dream.” More on Housing Crisis

See the rest here:
Stockton, California Is Foreclosureville, USA, Has One Of The Worst Foreclosure Rates In The United Sates

The Crunchies Photo Gallery

Posted by Giggi On January - 10 - 2010

The third annual Crunchies Awards last night were a smashing success , bringing together entrepreneurs, investors, startups, and other members of the tech community to honor the top in their class and enjoy an evening with friends. Thanks to everyone who attended the ceremony and the afterparty across the street at San Francisco’s City Hall, and we hope to see you all next year. We’ve got plenty of photos of the festivities, some of which we’ve embedded below. And there are many, many more photos available at the Crunchies 2009 Flickr Stream . All photos via the Crunchies 2009 Flickr Stream , except for the top two which are by Scott Beale / Laughing Squid . Crunch Network : CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

664b306fe8photo2.png 150x112 The Crunchies Photo Gallery

Here is the original post:
The Crunchies Photo Gallery

Jelli , which launched last year, is a user-controlled online streaming service – sort of a Digg for streaming music, or a group-controlled Pandora. Listeners vote songs up or down to create and alter the playlist. Today they’re announcing an important business development deal – an actual radio station, Live 105 in San Francisco, will be using Jelli to set their playlists every weekday. Starting this Monday, every weekday from 8 pm to midnight, Jelli takes over. Users don’t just vote songs up and down. They also get a limited number of Rockets and Bombs to move music more definitively up and down the list. And the chat area gets lively. Bad news for those radio DJs. Crunch Network : CrunchBase the free database of technology companies, people, and investors

ebee525914jelli.jpg 143x150 Jellis User Controlled Radio Gets A Big Win: Live 105 To Use It Daily

Go here to read the rest:
Jellis User Controlled Radio Gets A Big Win: Live 105 To Use It Daily

Percy Sutton Dead: Dies At 89

Posted by Giggi On December - 27 - 2009

NEW YORK — Percy Sutton, the pioneering civil rights attorney who represented Malcolm X before launching successful careers as a political power broker and media mogul, has died. He was 89. Marissa Shorenstein, a spokeswoman for Gov. David Paterson, confirmed that Sutton died Saturday. She did not know the cause. His daughter, Cheryl Sutton, declined to comment when reached by phone at her New York City home on Saturday before midnight. The son of a slave, Percy Sutton became a fixture on 125th Street in Harlem after moving to New York City following his service with the famed Tuskegee Airmen in World War II. His Harlem law office, founded in 1953, represented Malcolm X and the slain activist’s family for decades. The consummate politician, Sutton served in the New York State Assembly before taking over as Manhattan borough president in 1966, becoming the highest-ranking black elected official in the state. Sutton also mounted unsuccessful campaigns for the U.S. Senate and mayor of New York, and served as political mentor for the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s two presidential races. “The godfather,” Jackson once called him. In a statement released Saturday night, Gov. David Paterson called Sutton a mentor and “one of New York’s and this nation’s most influential African-American leaders.” “Percy was fiercely loyal, compassionate and a truly kind soul,” Paterson continued. “He will be missed but his legacy lives on through the next generations of African-Americans he inspired to pursue and fulfill their own dreams and ambitions.” In 1971, with his brother Oliver, Sutton purchased WLIB-AM, making it the first black-owned radio station in New York City. His Inner City Broadcasting Corp. eventually picked up WBLS-FM, which reigned for years as New York’s top-rated radio station, before buying stations in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Detroit and San Antonio between 1978-85. The Texas purchase marked a homecoming for the suave and sophisticated Sutton, born in San Antonio on Nov. 24, 1920, the youngest of 15 children. Among Sutton’s other endeavors was his purchase and renovation of the famed Apollo Theater when the Harlem landmark’s demise appeared imminent. Sutton’s father, Samuel, was born into slavery just before the Civil War. The elder Sutton became principal at a segregated San Antonio high school, and he made education a family priority: All 12 of his surviving children attended college. When he was 13, Percy Sutton endured a traumatic experience that drove him inexorably into the fight for racial equality. A police officer approached Sutton as the teen handed out NAACP pamphlets. “N—–, what are you doing out of your neighborhood?” he asked before beating the youth. When World War II arrived, Sutton’s enlistment attempts were rebuffed by Southern white recruiters. The young man went to New York, where he was accepted and joined the Tuskegee Airmen. After the war, Sutton earned a law degree in New York while working as a post office clerk and a subway conductor. He served again as an Air Force intelligence officer during the Korean War before returning to Harlem in 1953 and establishing his law office with brother Oliver and a third partner, George Covington. In addition to representing Malcolm X for a decade until his 1965 assassination, the Sutton firm handled the cases of more than 200 defendants arrested in the South during the 1963-64 civil rights marches. Sutton was also elected to two terms as president of the New York office of the NAACP. After Malcolm’s assassination, Sutton worked as lawyer for Malcolm’s widow, Betty Shabazz. He represented her grandson, 12-year-old Malcolm Shabazz, when the youth was accused of setting a 1997 fire that caused her death. Sutton was elected to the state Legislature in 1965, and quickly emerged as spokesman for its 13 black members. His charisma and eloquence led to his selection as Manhattan borough president in 1966, completing the term of Constance Baker Motley, who was appointed federal judge. Two years later, Sutton announced a run for the U.S. Senate seat held by Jacob Javits, although he pulled out of the Democratic primary to back Paul O’Dwyer. Sutton remained in his Manhattan job through 1977, the same year he launched a doomed campaign for mayor that ended with Edward I. Koch defeating six competitors for the Democratic nomination. Sutton was among the first voices raised against the Vietnam War, surrendering his delegate’s seat at the 1968 Democratic convention in protest and supporting anti-war candidate George McGovern four years later against incumbent President Richard Nixon. In addition to his radio holdings, Sutton also headed a group that owned The Amsterdam News, the second largest black weekly newspaper in the country. The paper was later sold. Sutton’s devotion to Harlem and its people was rarely more evident than when he spent $250,000 to purchase the shuttered Apollo Theater in 1981. The Apollo turned 70 in 2004, a milestone that was unthinkable until Sutton stepped in to save the landmark. Sutton “retired” in 1991, but his work as an adviser, mentor and confidante to politicians and businessmen never abated. He was among a group of American businessmen selected during the Clinton administration to attend meetings with the Group of Seven (G-7) Nations in 1995-96. “He was a great man,” said Charles Warfield Jr., the president and chief operating officer of ICBC Broadcast Holdings Inc., reached early Sunday morning. He declined to comment further out of respect, he indicated, for the wishes of Sutton’s family. The Rev. Al Sharpton planned a news conference Sunday to talk about Sutton’s life and legacy.

More:
Percy Sutton Dead: Dies At 89

A weary hello from OHare Airport in Chicago, Illinois – the world’s coldest and most inhospitable airport, right in the frozen heart of the world’s coldest and most inhospitable city. That a community organizer from this city would dream of becoming President is no surprise. Chicago is, after all, the only place in the world capable of making Washington DC look like a step up. Im trapped here in standby limbo: my original connecting flight to Nashville cancelled due to snow the kind of freak weather condition that no one in Chicago could possibly have predicted for December. Still, at least Ive been awake since 4am GMT, and at least my flight left London an hour late because every single passenger had to be patted down by American Airlines staff at the gate, having already passed through the usual madness of security. And at least by every single passenger I mean there unfolded a preposterous pantomime where posh white dudes like me were given the most cursorily of rub-downs in order to keep the line moving while those poor saps who fit the terrorist profile which is to say, anyone who looked a bit brown were deep-tissue massaged half to death a gaggle of goons in latex gloves. And at least all of that nonsense was utterly pointless because, as any self-respecting terrorist apparently knows, they dont dare go anywhere near your groin. It would be very easy for me to write a reactionary column this week about how technology should have made travel delays like this a thing of the past. About how we have heated soccer pitches, and yet were told that heated runways dont stack up economically. Or how theres no point in having terrorist watch-lists if people on them are still able to get on flights with bombs sewn into their underwear. I mean, Jesus, were days away from the end of the first decade of The Future 40 years after we put a man on the moon and yet there are so many areas where technology still lets us down. But what good would that do me? Im already stressed and they say when youre in a stressful situation you should focus on the positives, not dwell on the negatives. The fact is, for every major way in which the technology of the last decade has failed to deliver hoverboards, teleportation there are half a dozen smaller advances so mindblowingly significant to our day-to-day lives that we already take them for granted. For a start, the only thing making this six-hour extended layover in the frozen circle of hell even slightly bearable is the fact that I have my laptop, a power-outlet and decent quality wifi. How the hell did we manage before wifi? It was less than ten years ago that hotspots started to appear – considerably less in the case of airports – and yet already the idea of not being able to access the Internet anytime, anywhere is genuinely impossible to imagine. Like trying to recall how we made social plans before mobile phones, or how we identified prospective sexual partners before Bebo. Whether it be airport wifi on our laptops or oh-just-connect-you-bastard flakiness on the iPhone, the fact that the Internet has become more ubiquitous than electricity in major cities in the past decade is – without any hyperbole whatsoever- a miracle. Sure, it’s destroyed lunch conversation and pub trivia but, in common with anyone who hit their 20s or 30s in the 2000s, I’d happily swap either of those for the ability to book a flight from the back of a cab, or to consult Wikipedia from the toilet. And, oh, Wikipedia! Sure its unreliable as all hell (citation needed) and anything remotely controversial becomes a battleground of edits and bullshit, but there’s still something incredible about legions of unpaid volunteers, hunched in parental basements around the globe, collaborating to produce an encyclopedia of all human knowledge. Like most hacks, I consult Wikipedia at least half a dozen times a day, safe in the knowledge that Ill be able to find a fact accurate or not – to support just about any theory my fevered imagination can dream up. A theory that I can write about in a reputable publication and thus, by Wikipedia standards, launder into truth. And how about Netflix? Or Hulu. Or Pandora. Or Last.fm. Or Spotify. To our kids it will seem as natural as water, but neither you nor I will forget the first time we clicked on the title of a song or a movie, only for it to instantly begin playing with crystal clarity. As I’ve written before , it’s the same feeling you experience when a magician turns water into wine in front of your eyes. With all of our talk of DRM and musicians and directors and – oh yeah – authors losing their livelihood it’s easy to forget how utterly bloody marvelous it is that all human creativity is just sitting in the air, all queued up and waiting for us to press play. In fact, just sitting here, staring out of the window at the snow, I can think of a dozen more technological advances of the past decade that it would be impossible to imagine the world without. Google. The iPod. Facebook. Skype. YouTube. Online banking. ATM check processing. Celebrity sex tapes. Snopes. GPS mapping for all on cellphones. The Kindle. Trip Advisor. As if to prove my point, as I finished writing that list, my iPhone started to vibrate in my pocket. It was a friend in San Francisco who had been following my snowbound breakdown on Twitter and had decided to call to cheer me up. At about the same time, another friend this one in London instant messaged me with a very inappropriate joke about bombs on planes which also brightened my evening no end. Ten years ago that simply wouldnt have happened, nor would I be able to distract myself for another few minutes by sending them both a cameraphone photo of all the snow (above). Indeed, the technology of the past decade may not have helped me escape from Chicago but it has at least given me a mental escape tunnel to prevent me going completely mad. And for that reason alone, I raise a frozen hand in salute the technology of the00s and look forward with excitement with what the 10s will bring. I just hope they start with heated fucking runways. Seriously how hard can it be? Crunch Network : CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

2086149d6angsnow.jpg 150x112 NSFW: The Physical Impossibility of The Future in the Mind of Someone Trapped In Chicago

The rest is here:
NSFW: The Physical Impossibility of The Future in the Mind of Someone Trapped In Chicago

In a major departure from conventional climate wisdom, Thomas Friedman argues in today’s New York Times that the UNFCCC framework is broken and should be replaced by a global competition in the clean-tech industry, which he says the United States can and should lead. “Let the Earth Race begin,” he declares, contrasting this with the long-dominant “Earth Day” strategy: “This Copenhagen climate summit was based on the Earth Day strategy. It was not very impressive. This conference produced a series of limited, conditional, messy compromises, which it is not at all clear will get us any closer to mitigating climate change at the speed and scale we need… Today, we need the Earth Race: who can be the first to invent the most clean technologies so men and women can live safely here on Earth… An Earth Race led by America — built on markets, economic competition, national self-interest and strategic advantage — is a much more self-sustaining way to reduce carbon emissions than a festival of voluntary, nonbinding commitments at a U.N. conference.” Friedman is right. The race to develop competitive clean-tech industries is the critical element with the potential to motivate enough development and deployment of clean technologies – far more than any potential “legally-binding” global emissions treaty, as we’ve seen with the failure of the Kyoto Protocol and the inability of the UNFCCC framework to produce a meaningful treaty at Copenhagen. The International Energy Agency estimates that $10.5 trillion of global investment in clean technology and energy efficiency is necessary over the next 20 years to stay below 450ppm – an unimaginable sum under any UNFCCC treaty. Moreover, building the long-term political support of a broad segment of the American public requires a national agenda centrally focused on competing in the clean-tech growth industries of the future. As Friedman explains, “If you start the conversation with “climate” you might get half of America to sign up for action. If you start the conversation with giving birth to a “whole new industry” — one that will make us more energy independent, prosperous, secure, innovative, respected and able to out-green China in the next great global industry — you get the country.” Indeed, countries like China, Japan, and South Korea are already launching massive government investment programs to dominate this industry – not because their priority is reducing carbon emissions, but because they recognize the economic potential. In our recent report, ” Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant ,” we found that China, Japan, and South Korea – Asia’s “clean technology tigers” – have already surpassed the United States in the production of virtually all clean energy technologies, an advantage they are solidifying and expanding with direct, large-scale government investment strategies. As his competitive solution, Friedman repeats his call for a price on carbon. “The goal of Earth Racers is to focus on getting the U.S. Senate to pass an energy bill, with a long-term price on carbon that will really stimulate America to become the world leader in clean-tech,” he writes. “All [Obama] needed to do in his speech was to look China’s prime minister in the eye and say: “I am going to get our Senate to pass an energy bill with a price on carbon so we can clean your clock in clean-tech. This is my moon shot. Game on.” The Chinese prime minister might just have laughed in Obama’s face. Why? Because a modest carbon price is far too weak to regain American competitiveness in the face of Asia’s massive investment projects. These governments are set to out-invest the United States by three to one in these industries over the next five years – $509 billion compared to $172 billion in the U.S., assuming passage of the proposed American Clean Energy and Security Act and including current appropriations and stimulus measures. No wonder Deutsche Bank recently concluded that “generous and well-targeted [clean-tech] incentives” backed by “comprehensive and integrated government plans” in China and Japan will create a low-risk environment for investors and stimulate high levels of private investment. In contrast, Deutsche Bank concluded, the U.S. is a “moderate-risk” country compared to the lower-risk environment of China and Japan, because we rely on “a more volatile market incentive approach and has suffered from a start-stop approach in some areas.” According to another recent report by the China Greentech Initiative, China’s national clean-tech market could eventually grow to $1 trillion annually. Earth to Thomas Friedman! Winning the “Earth Race” requires major federal investments in clean technology development and deployment . “If the United States hopes to compete for new clean energy industries,” we conclude in ” Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant ,” “it must close the widening gap between U.S. and Asian government investments in research and innovation, manufacturing, and domestic market demand. Small, indirect and uncoordinated incentives are not sufficient to outcompete Asia’s clean tech tigers. To regain economic leadership in the global clean energy industry, U.S. energy policy must include large, direct and coordinated investments in clean technology R&D, manufacturing, deployment, and infrastructure.” Winning the “Earth Race” also requires a national effort in high-tech energy education, and President Obama’s RE-ENERGYSE proposal is a critical first step, especially in the realm of higher education. As my colleague and I wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle , “To win today’s clean-energy race, the United States must respond with the same vigorous commitment to education and innovation that won the space race four decades ago. If America does not take immediate action to bridge its energy education gap – and if we fail to make substantially larger investments in our own clean-energy economy – we will effectively cede the clean-energy race to Asia.” Yet instead of calling for an effort to actually strengthen the Senate bill to match what energy innovation experts say is necessary (including dozens of Nobel Laureates, Brookings Institution, Association of American Universities, Google, and others) – at least $15 billion per year for clean energy R&D, compared to $1.2 billion in the current proposal – Friedman simply calls for passing the bill in its current form. Indeed, he doesn’t seem to care whether the bill is strong enough to accomplish much of anything besides a modest price on carbon, as he explained in an op-ed after the passage of Waxman-Markey : “It is pathetic that we couldn’t do better [than Waxman-Markey]. It is appalling that so much had to be given away to polluters. It stinks. It’s a mess. I detest it. Now let’s get it passed in the Senate and make it law.” That is no strategy to win the “Earth Race.” Reflecting on the surge in Afghanistan, Friedman recently wrote , “China, Russia and Al Qaeda all love the idea of America doing a long, slow bleed in Afghanistan.” His point extends here as well: China, Japan, South Korea, and the rest of our competitors would love the idea of America settling on a “pathetic” bill with modest clean-tech investment and pricing. The United States did not win the space race with a tax on airplanes. We did not invent the Internet by enforcing a cap and trade system on fax machines, nor did we create the personal computer by taxing typewriters. Those who suggest we can simply rely on indirect, market-based mechanisms to achieve a clean energy revolution – including Thomas Friedman – fail to understand the history of technology innovation and competitiveness, and they risk relegating our clean-tech industry to second-class status or worse. Fifty years ago, in the wake of the launch of Sputnik, the United States launched a massive national effort to lead the space race and win the Cold War. Today, the clean energy race represents one of the greatest opportunities and challenges for American leadership in a generation. If we do not take immediate action to launch a national energy competitiveness project based on large, direct, and coordinated innovation policies, we will effectively cede the clean-energy industry to Asia and other competitors. The mass majority of exports, jobs, tax revenues, and other economic benefits will accrue to foreign countries, and we will miss a historic opportunity to achieve a new era of American leadership. The choice should be clear. More on Thomas Friedman

Read the original:
Teryn Norris: Earth to Thomas Friedman: Winning the "Earth Race" Requires Federal Investment

SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 16 /PRNewswire/ — Quantros, Inc., a leading provider of safety and quality software and professional services solutions for the healthcare industry, announces the creation of a new healthcare IT consulting division.

The rest is here:
Safety and Quality Software Developer Quantros, Inc. Launches Healthcare IT Consulting Division (redOrbit)

The UN climate change meeting in Copenhagen is putting a lot of pressure on oil-producing nations in the Middle East; but the reality is that most countries in the region are failing miserably in all areas of environmental protection. To that end, the United Nations has called for more reporting on the environment in the Middle East to spur awareness and change, and three organizations (including one I’m involved in) have taken on the challenge. Environmentalists and writers from Palestine, Jordan and Israel will meet next Sunday in Madaba, Jordan for a 2-day workshop: ” Blogging for the Environment ” on December 20-21. The workshop will be hosted by a green news site I founded — Green Prophet , the Jordanian youth organization Masar Center, and the Palestinian Volunteering for Peace group that organizes service trips for foreigners. Funded by the San Francisco-based United Religions Initiative , 15 prominent journalists and bloggers in Arabic, Hebrew and English will be meeting to brainstorm new ways to report on and instigate environmental change in areas of activism, design, urban health, religion, and clean technologies. We plan on reporting our updates on GreenProphet.com (watch this page) . No one can argue about the importance of clean air, fresh drinking water, and the pressing need for adopting new technologies like solar power for clean and renewable energy. The environment is a leveler connecting Muslims, Jews, and Christians in this part of the world. By focusing on our shared challenges like global warming, water and pollution, we hope to encourage the crucial conversations and work in the field for a cleaner, more rewarding and sustainable Middle East. Filling Holes in Environment Media Coverage Led by my friend and colleague Daniella Cheslow, a Green Prophet blogger and freelance reporter, the workshop will offer an opportunity for promising Palestinian, Jordanian and Israeli writers to learn first-hand about regional environmental issues, to write about them in English, and to maintain important connections after the conference is over. A focus point of the workshop is to teach journalists, inexperienced or new to blogging, successful techniques to reporting effectively using the blogging medium. “Writing for the Internet age can be isolating. In this conference we are hoping not only to sharpen our blogging skills, but also to build a regional community of talented environmental journalists,” says Cheslow. “As our ecological problems cross borders, so must the people who cover them.” More about Green Prophet : Green Prophet is the most popular Middle East news blog covering environment news from the region. Featured on large mainstream news sites, and a Top 100 Green Blog, its 20 writers based in the Middle East, the UK and the US, report on climate change, water issues, clean technologies, sustainable food, Middle East religion and the environment, as well as green design. www.greenprophet.com More about The Masar Center : Masar is a regional youth NGO working on issues of environment, media, democracy and human rights. Over the last 15 years, Masar has implemented several projects in the region targeting youth and youth leaders and created a platform for them to join alliances and partnerships. Masar has also worked on EuroMed issues of dialogue and cooperation bringing together activists from both regions to address issues of common interest. More about Volunteering for Peace : Volunteering for Peace is a Palestinian non-governmental organization aiming to participate in establishing a bridge between the different faith and cultural groups in Palestine by spreading the idea of peace and non-violence in the world. Volunteering for Peace is an active cooperation circle of United Religions Initiative in Palestine. Further information can be seen at http://vfpeace.blogspot.com/ More on Middle East

Read this article:
Karin Kloosterman: Palestinian, Israeli, and Jordanians Unite for Green Blogging Workshop in Amman

49ers Vs. Cardinals: Niners Surprise Arizona, 24-9

Posted by Giggi On December - 15 - 2009

SAN FRANCISCO — The Arizona Cardinals threw away a chance to clinch a second straight NFC West crown. Alex Smith threw touchdown passes after two of Arizona’s seven turnovers, Frank Gore ran for 167 yards and another score and the San Francisco 49ers kept their slim playoff hopes alive with a dominant 24-9 victory Monday night. With a relentless defensive attack, San Francisco forced the sloppy Cardinals into five first-half turnovers and kept Kurt Warner from finding a groove. Warner threw two interceptions in the opening half after going 130 passes without a pick. Now, Arizona (8-5) can still clinch the division by winning two of its final three games. Gore had his most productive game since Week 2, running over a Cardinals defense that held Adrian Peterson to just 19 yards in a win against Minnesota last week. Gore was certainly motivated for a big night after getting only 30 yards on 22 carries in a season-opening victory at Arizona on Sept. 13. Smith, coming off a loss at Seattle last week in which he threw for a career-high 310 yards, connected on TD passes to Vernon Davis and Michael Crabtree and finished 19 of 35 for 144 yards. The 49ers (6-7) answered coach Mike Singletary’s challenge to make a statement on the national stage against the reigning NFC champions. The Cardinals had their second game with six or more turnovers of the season, much to the delight of the sellout crowd at Candlestick Park. The 49ers had a franchise-record five forced fumbles, two by safety Dashon Goldson. Not long ago, San Francisco hoped this game would be for the division title, but the Niners had lost six of eight following a 3-1 start, including five straight road games by 19 total points since the victory at Arizona. They sure showed up for this one, on a night former San Francisco stars Steve Young and Jerry Rice worked the pregame show for ESPN on the sideline. Warner followed the best four-game stretch of his career with a dud – going 16 of 29 for 178 yards with two interceptions and being sacked four times. Warner, who joined Johnny Unitas as the only quarterbacks to post a passer rating of at least 120 in four straight games, had gone 130 passes without an interception before Goldson picked off a pass intended for Steve Breaston early in the second quarter. Warner later threw another. And it didn’t help matters the Cardinals lost star receiver Larry Fitzgerald early in the second half to a right knee injury after Goldson landed on him. He later returned. The 49ers forced five turnovers in the first half for the first time since Sept. 14, 1997, against New Orleans. Arizona was shut out in a first half for the first time since Dec. 21, 2008, at New England. Davis caught his 11th touchdown pass of the season, extending his franchise-record mark by a tight end. Crabtree’s second career TD reception was a 35-yard catch 52 seconds before halftime. Joe Nedney added a 37-yard field goal. Arizona finally got on the board on Neil Rackers’ 48-yard field goal with 5:52 left in the third quarter, then Beanie Wells pounded into the end zone on an impressive second effort on fourth-and-goal from the 1 early in the final quarter. Ray McDonald blocked the extra-point attempt. Arizona was out of sync from the start. The Cardinals jumped offside on three of four snaps during the 49ers’ opening drive, which was thwarted when Cardinals defensive lineman Darnell Dockett tipped a batted pass to himself for an interception. San Francisco reviewed the call, but it stood as an interception. Smith had gone 99 attempts without throwing a pick. San Francisco used up its second and final review of the game with 4:39 left in the first quarter, winning that one to give Dre’ Bly a recovery of Tim Hightower’s fumble and a first-and-goal at the 8 for the 49ers. Smith threw a 5-yard TD strike to Davis two plays later for a 7-0 lead. Crabtree wound up with five catches for 67 yards. The 49ers swept the season series after Arizona did so in 2008. The teams haven’t split their two annual meetings since each winning at home in 2003, with the 49ers capturing both matchups in 2004 and ‘07 and Arizona taking each in 2005 and ‘06. San Francisco played without left tackle Joe Staley, who worked out hard on the field before the game and had hoped to return after spraining his right knee Nov. 1 at Indianapolis. More on NFL

Here is the original post:
49ers Vs. Cardinals: Niners Surprise Arizona, 24-9

AT&T data outage in San Francisco?

Posted by Giggi On December - 12 - 2009

Reports are flying in — using WiFi, we suspect — that AT&T ’s having a bit of a data and SMS outage in San Francisco. Our own personal experiences confirm the data, although text messages are sending and receiving just fine. According to a tweet found by TechCrunch, customer service is saying it’ll take anywhere from 24 to 48 hours to fix — sounds pretty extreme to us, and unfortunately we can’t get ahold of anyone to corroborate. Let’s put it to you, Bay Area readers, how’s that iPhone working for ya? Update: Just got a statement from AT&T. “We are seeing a hardware issue in downtown San Francisco that is causing some degradation in service. GSM and EDGE voice and data services are still accessible. Our experts are aware and working to resolve as quickly as possible. Further resolution is expected this evening.” We tried it ourselves and, yep, if you turn off 3G capabilities on your phone (if possible), data will work just fine. Update: Our 3G data seems to be working now, and you? AT&T data outage in San Francisco? originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink ? TechCrunch ?|? Twitter ?|? Email this ?|? Comments

fb61b718e7rm eng.jpg 100x150 AT&T data outage in San Francisco?

See the original post:
AT&T data outage in San Francisco?

Gavin Newsom: A San Francisco Landmark Goes Green

Posted by Giggi On December - 12 - 2009

Today, the most famous building in San Francisco is also one of the most environmentally friendly in the country. The Transamerica Pyramid building has achieved a LEED Gold certification. Even in these difficult economic times, green building is taking off in San Francisco, thanks to our aggressive green building regulations for new construction and large-scale retrofits, the strongest in the nation. In 2009, LEED certified square footage has increased five-fold in San Francisco. We now have more green buildings than New York or Los Angeles. However, new construction and major renovation projects represent less than 1 percent of the city’s real estate each year. At the standard rate of 0.8 percent new buildings per year in San Francisco, it could take more than sixty years to green even half of the City. When you add to the fact that buildings make up 45 percent of our city’s greenhouse gas emissions, it is clear we need to address San Francisco’s existing buildings. That’s why in February of this year, I convened the Existing Commercial Buildings Task Force, bringing together 19 key stakeholders from San Francisco’s building community to recommend practical solutions to green the city’s existing commercial buildings. They delivered their final report and recommendations (PDF) to me today. Amplifying the great work already happening in San Francisco with our energy, water efficiency, and zero waste initiatives, the Task Force recommends that commercial buildings adopt a voluntary goal: cut total energy use in existing commercial buildings 50 percent by 2030. The Task Force also recommends that the City require commercial buildings to conduct a performance audit to identify cost-effective ways to reduce energy use. Our experience with existing rate-payer efficiency programs shows that at least 40 percent of businesses that conduct an audit will undertake efficiency measures. When business owners see how much they can improve their bottom line with energy efficiency–and the incentives and rebates available to minimize upfront costs–the decision is a simple one. Another recommendation is to require each business to benchmark energy use annually and make that information public. Information in this case is quite literally power. This metric empowers potential building tenants or buyers to favor energy efficient buildings, just like a potential car buyer may consider miles per gallon when making their purchase. By making energy use public, it will further incentivize building owners to maximize environmental performance. If fully implemented, the proposed Task Force strategy is expected to generate hundreds of new green jobs in commercial energy efficiency, and lead to annual greenhouse gas reductions of 70,000 tons within five years–while saving the private sector more than $600 million. Join Mayor Newsom on Facebook . You can also follow him on Twitter . More on Green Living

Read more from the original source:
Gavin Newsom: A San Francisco Landmark Goes Green

SAN FRANCISCO — At the NewTeeVee conference this month , we caught up with Sam Blackman , CEO of Elemental Technologies. The company has launched a new server appliance for transcoding live HD video at very fast rates, “faster than real time,” the company says. New York Times reporter Ashlee Vance wrote last week that Elemental Technologies, which uses Nvidia chips for its processing…..”can encode video streams in record time and do it with less hardware.” Here’s a profile of the Portland, Oregon-based company by Liz Gannes in NewTeeVee from earlier this year. You can find this post on Beet.TV

Read this article:
Andy Plesser: Video: Elemental Technologies is Transcoding Video in "Record Time," The New York Times

“ Email is not going to disappear. Possibly ever. Until the robots kill us all. ” – Paul Buchheit , creator of Gmail, co-founder of FriendFeed, currently doing vague infrastructure things at Facebook. Today, at our RealTime CrunchUp event in San Francisco, Buchheit and Threadsy founder Rob Goldman sat down for a chat with our own Steve Gillmor and Erick Schonfeld. The topic was: Can We Kill Email Already? All Aboard The Micro-Message Bus. So can we kill email? Well if Buchheit’s quote didn’t tip you off, the consensus was “no.” Though there are some interesting things coming out that are helping to expand our communication, we’re just not at the point now where we can live without email. And in fact, for many of these services like Twitter and Facebook, you still need email to be notified about new followers or new messages. Threadsy (which launched at TechCrunch50 this year) is trying to help the transition away from email by integrating it with other services like Twitter, but even Goldman acknowledges that the email notification problem remains an issue because people keep relying on it. At one point, a question from the audience asked about Google Wave, another would be “email-killer,” and Schonfeld noted that he was having a hard time getting into it because he wasn’t getting notified via email when there is a new Wave message. So you can see the problem. Speaking of Wave, when asked about his thoughts on it, Buchheit noted that he hadn’t actually tried it yet, while laughing. “The invite is sitting in my inbox.” This is significant because Buchheit was instrumental in creating Gmail for Google. But Buchheit doesn’t consider Google Wave as a replacement of email or even Twitter or Facebook. Both him and Goldman agreed that it seemed more of a collaboration tool. And both felt that despite some great technology it was still a few years away from having a polished experience. When asked if there would be a mashup of social and private streams, such as email and Facebook with Twitter, Buchheit said that he felt rather than one thing killing off another that we would just keep layering on new things. Goldman noted that the next step for Threadsy is to provide better context about the messages you’re getting and who you are talking to. He also noted that being able to search across all your messages is key. So, no. Email isn’t dead yet, but it may be changing. [photo: (cc) Kenneth Yeung - www.thelettertwo.com] Crunch Network : MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

4677cd26c208 PM.png 150x102 Gmail Creator Thinks Email Will Last Forever. And Hasnt Tried Google Wave.

Read the rest here:
Gmail Creator Thinks Email Will Last Forever. And Hasnt Tried Google Wave.

Today at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, News Corp. Chief Digital Officer Jonathan Miller sat down to talk with Federated Media’s John Battelle. Miller oversees a lot of projects for News Corp., most notably MySpace. Miller reiterated some of what MySpace CEO Owen Van Natta said yesterday at the conference . They have a plan to move forward focusing on what they believe they’re good at, socializing content, which will be music-heavy thanks to their deals with the music labels. In the audience question part at the end, TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington got up to ask Miller specifically about the sale of Photobucket, which we first reported on , but News Corp. has yet to confirm. Miller laughed, but said “ No, I can’t make that announcement here. ” That of course implies that they will make the announcement at some point. Miller acknowledged that Photobucket is right in the middle of an important business decision for News Corp.: Are some of their assets stand-alone products, or part of the bigger picture? “ It will be resolved shortly, but not today ,” Miller said. From what we’ve heard, MySpace is going to sell Photobucket to Ontela for a deal valued at $60 million , which is a huge markdown from the $250 million (plus a $50 million earn-out) that MySpace paid for the company in 2007. Below find my live notes from the Q&A (paraphrased): JB: What do you make of this whole rodeo around Twitter? JM: I think it’s great. Search had been out of the socialization of the web thing, now it’s in it. It’s also clear that we have a lot of competition. It’s great. It’s not a one-horse race. Microsoft is hanging in there (in search). JB: What’s it like to work with Rupert Murdoch? JM: It’s fascinating. He’s so curious. He wants to know everything about everything. No matter what it is. He retains his ambition. He’s as ambitious as anyone I’ve ever met. JB: What’s your job? What does it involve? JM: I’m Chairman and CEO of the Digital Media group. I do two things really: One, I’m the executive in charge of a lot of businesses like MySpace. The other role is to provide strategy and guidance for the entire corporation. JB: How do you split your time between those two? Thoughts on all this media stuff? JM: Rupert feels there needs to be a paid content model – that doesn’t mean there won’t be free as well, but that’s our stance. There will be free and paid, but there will be paid. I spend half my time in that world trying to figure it out. JB: It is just a pay wall? JM: That’s a hard way to do it. You have to offer value to the users. It has to be different from the free area. It’s not just throwing a pay wall. Wall Street Journal is working with that model. You can walk and chew gum at the same time. JB: So that works for the WSJ, but they have a fat wallet audience. JM: Well I think they offer value. JB: Why leave what you were doing? JM: I was having a good time and we were investing in a few key areas. One big one was online video. That was fun and focused. But I was given the opportunity to work on a larger scale with more difficulty. I’m a glutten for punishment. JB: The idea was that you were going to have to “fix MySpace,” right? Owen was here yesterday laying out the plan. How is it going? How do you know it’s working? JM: Fix isn’t the right word. Nothing was broken that we’re putting it back. You have to think ahead. I don’t want to be in the catch up game. We need to get the essence of what MySpace is. It’s about making contacts, we’re getting back to that. The social part. Look at the big picture, then focus it down. Music announcements are core. There was some stuff that needed to be fixed. You need to stablize loss of traffic. It’s been a combination of organic loss of traffic and cleaning up the service. We’re stablizing it, but it’s not the fix game. We need to do new and different. JB: Rupert got a lot of credit for making that investment at the time. Is he upset for how it has gone? JM: You know you have to keep moving forward. But MySpace didn’t keep going. There have been competitiors in the general space, Facebook and Twitter that came along. We’re upset that we didn’t keep going. It’s hard to regain momentum. JB: Is Twitter overhyped? JM: It’s fascinating. I didn’t think it would have been what it is now. But the question is: Where does it go? They’re smart to be an open platform. The money question is easier, I think. Their new deals are interesting, but it doesn’t take you to a billion valuation. Are you your own thing or are you a sub-category of what Facebook is doing? That’s the question. JB: Is News Corp. a buyer in this space right now? JM: We did just buy iLike. It’s strategic. We’re not just trying to go after cool businesses, it has to be about our strategy. That’s a music focus with iLike. We’re not just investing. JB: What are the key strategies? JM: Generally I’m obsessed with realtime. I have been for a long time, even when I was with AOL. I didn’t know it back then, but now you can really see it. Twitter is one level, but it’s beyond that. Another interest is global. I just returned from Asia – it was really eye-opening. As we heard from Mary Meeker, the mobile world over there is amazing. They have things over there that compete with the iPhone. The mobile Internet is huge over there. We’re actually behind over here. It’s a huge transformation. For MySpace music and games. It needs to start with an “M” a “G” or an “E”. We need to open our platform more with MySpace, like Twitter is doing. JB: Talk about FAN (Fox Audience Network). JM: Most people in the audience would know the biggest ad networks, but not the #5 one, which is us. We’re moving up. We want to be #4. A deal with Omnicom helps us big time. It’s a real-time bidding network, advertisers can buy directly in to this huge network. They can buy a huge audience. It’s giving that power over to the buy side. It’s the beginning of a coming out part for FAN. Display advertising is coming. JB: In display publishers feel threatened right? You can reach through the brand and grab an audience. Is that a problem? JM: Yep. I think it’s a real change. There will be a premium world that will command high CPMs. Hulu can do that. It’s a true premium buy and a great expereience. Then there is the cheap inventory that can go to a broad audience. I think FAN can help with that. But the middle will get squeezed. You have to be premium or bulk. It’s hard in the middle. JB: FAN is an exchange network right? JM: Yeah directionally exchange. JB: How’s it different from what’s out there. JM: Along with a move to display, it’s a move to exchange. FAN uses the social networking environment. People tell you stuff freely through these networks. We’re not doing profiles, but it’s audience, to be clear. JB: So if I declare what I’m interested in on MySpace, but then I go to another FAN network, and I see an ad for what I’m interested in. JM: You can spread that across the web. JB: Let’s go back in time a bit. As the former CEO of AOL, the new CEO TIm Armstrong – what should I ask him? JM: That’s a good one. I’m thrilled he’s there. They need to get their freedom. I know they’re on track, but are they really. The freedom from Time Warner. That’s #1. It’s mutually felt, both want it. Is it on track. Number two is how does the new content focus scale? Can you make enough of it in the model they have. The portal-based model. The third, what’s happening in ad sales? Revenue is kind of important and AOL has a declining revenue and subscription base. So you need accelerating ads. It’s so key to that company. Audience Q&A Q: Is there a big opportunity for brands to do new things with all these social networking communities and sites? JM: Absolutely. That’s what AOL has been doing with TMZ, leveraging the AOL platform. We need to start new brands, not just extend networks. Q: Is authentication big? JM: Yes, it’s a big thing. Q: (From Mike) Did you sell Photobucket ? JM: (Laughs). I’m confident that is Mike Arrington. No I can’t make that announcement here. But look, we’re going over all our assets, is it a stand-alone or does it fit? Photobucket is right in the middle of that. It will be resolved shortly, but not today. Q: Talk about MySpace versus Facebook and Twitter. JM: Twitter is about the assymettic relationship. Facebook is symmetric. MySpace is in between. We’ve had both in our history. We need to declare a major. Facebook is trying to be everything it seems. We’re more about interests of our users going forward, more than just the friend thing. I think we’re closer to Twitter. But we can be richer, I think. I don’t know if Twitter with change, but that’s how it is today. Q: Talk about copyrights. JM: We need to have copyrights that are expected. Even in China they realize that. They have a budding content industry too. They’re very interested in copyright and piracy. I think we’ll have an Internet that respects copyright. That’s a wrap. Crunch Network : CrunchBase the free database of technology companies, people, and investors

5d4226068250x250.jpg 125x150 Web 2 Summit: Jonathan Miller Is Obsessed With Realtime, Wont Talk Photobucket

Follow this link:
Web 2 Summit: Jonathan Miller Is Obsessed With Realtime, Wont Talk Photobucket

Sandip Roy: Guess Who’s Not Coming to The Olympics

Posted by Giggi On October - 3 - 2009

It’s probably just as well that Barack Obama’s magic touch didn’t work on the International Olympic Committee. The election of Obama has certainly reduced the number of globetrotting Americans who try to pass for Canadian. But he can’t just touch down for five hours and seal the deal. But the most interesting quote I read about Chicago’s drubbing in the Olympic hosting race was a question from an I.O.C. member from Pakistan. Syed Shahid Ali asked how smooth it would be for foreigners to enter the United States for the Games because as he put it, coming to the US these days can be “a harrowing experience.” I hope Obama noted that. This is a slap in the face reminder that the election of Obama has changed a certain style and the image but the levers of bureaucracy underneath have not necessarily changed course. It’s not just Olympic athletes from countries like Pakistan or Iraq. Scientists, artists, students are all facing the same hurdles getting into the US. And many of them just don’t want to come. Who wants the airport humiliation? A couple of years ago I remember the San Francisco International Film Festival complaining that many eminent filmmakers couldn’t get visas. The Iranian contingent was especially hurt by the visa clampdown. Tragically, Iran has probably the most illustrious filmmaking industry in the region. The very renowned director Abbas Kiarostami was denied a visa when he was coming to the US to debut his film Ten. A couple of other directors from other parts of the world also decided not to come as an act of solidarity. In 2006, a group of Iranian academics and scientists coming for the Northern California reunion of the prestigious Sharif Institute of Technology found themselves turned away from US airports even after they got the visa. Behnam Kamrani who lives in Sweden and works for a US company got to spend nine hours in the airport before being turned back. But he considered himself one of the “lucky ones” because he was not handcuffed. In 2004 for the first time since 1971, the number of foreign students enrolled in US colleges and universities declined thanks to the “war on terror”. Now the Census says for the first time in three decades the number of foreign-born Americans in this country tapered off slightly in 2008 . Nobody wants to be the visa officer that let in the terrorist. But instead of analyzing Chicago’s downfall in the IOC as a litmus test of Obama’s magic, it should be a wake up call for the US. The world didn’t reject Obama. It’s gotten the symbolism of his election. Now it’s time to go beyond the symbols. It wants to see the promised change in action. And five hours of Obama isn’t enough change. Rio, apparently was change the IOC could believe in. More on Barack Obama

Continued here:
Sandip Roy: Guess Who’s Not Coming to The Olympics

Part 5: Brian Binnie Makes History One of the biggest concerns people have about space travel is whether or not it is safe. Yet, while I was launching into sub-orbit, the safety risk was the last thing on my mind. I was intimately involved in the rocket motor testing of the program and was comfortable with its capabilities and knew our air-launch approach gave us many more safety options than a ground launch of a conventional rocket. That final SpaceShipOne flight required high performance and fine precision to execute well. Because it demanded my full attention, I was just too busy to be concerned for my safety! I first learned about the X PRIZE while I was working for Rotary Rocket, testing a rocket that we designed and built, and were in the process of trying to fly. It was not until I joined Burt Rutan’s Scaled Composites team, under contract for Paul Allen that I thought it was possible to win the prize. At that point, the X PRIZE was unfunded and had no deadline, and yet, despite this, the prize became our motivator; the carrot that pushed us forward. We had a very small team of 30, which enabled us to be agile and flexible. There were not a lot of approvals that had to happen, so we could sit around a coffee table with our notes and make quick decisions that would be rapidly put into motion. We were confident we had the right technology, but the time frame was a major concern. Rightly so, because the initial competition deadline came and went without us sending SpaceShipOne into space. We needed an extension if we were going to succeed, and fortunately, the Ansaris gave it to us when they extended the competition deadline by a year. We finally completed the test flights for SpaceShipOne with very little time before the second deadline expired. The rules of the competition stipulated that we had to send the vehicle 100 kilometers into space twice in a two week period. The first flight was manned by my teammate Mike Melville, and while the flight was successful, it had some technical issues that needed to be addressed. The deadline forced us to focus. If there had been no X PRIZE, the technical issues in the first flight could have gotten the better of us, but the clock was ticking, so to speak, and we had the prize in our sights. Safety issues with Mike’s first X PRIZE flight were mostly a public misunderstanding and did not preoccupy us at Scaled. We certainly wanted to avoid a repeat performance of his “roll record” so that the follow-on effort for Virgin Galactic would have a better chance of being realized. When the day of my flight finally came, I was working with very little sleep. Prior to the release point, I had an excruciating hour in which I had little to do but sit, think, and come face to face with the demons that lurked into my thoughts as I waited. Would things go according to plan? Had SpaceShipOne revealed to us all its secrets? The flight test was under such a microscope that I couldn’t even sneeze – without multiple cameras in the cockpit beaming the images back to the many people watching including the whole Scaled team, the X PRIZE Foundation, Paul Allen, Sir Richard Branson, NASA, and tons of media outlets. Considering that I hadn’t flown the vehicle in some 10 months, I felt I was under a huge amount of pressure. Then, after the hour long wait, things shifted into fast forward and everything happened incredibly quickly. After release, I was under the impressive acceleration of the hybrid rocket and thundering toward space. The shuddering and shaking vibrations combined with the demonic screeching of that motor were most memorable. But, by far, the best part was the contrast provided when I shut off the rocket; Blessed peace and quiet and the instant karma of weightlessness. And then, my God, that view! Separating the black void that is space from the peaceful panorama below is a thin blue electric ribbon of light that is the atmosphere. For 4 minutes I got to soak it all in. I tell you, one cannot be unmoved by the experience! From Mojave, I could see the San Francisco Bay to the North, Baja Mexico to the south, the Sierra-Nevada Mountains and the Pacific. I captured some of the sights with a camera but it’s definitively something you need to see for yourself. It was almost possible to forget that I was still driving this spaceship and would have the challenge of bringing it back down to earth. Thankfully, due to the brilliance of Burt’s “feather” reentry configuration, that entire phase of flight, normally fraught with danger, was a non-event. There were some moderate G’s to endure and lots of noise as the atmosphere welcomed my supersonic return to Earth, but the ride was otherwise syrupy smooth compared to the rumbling ride under the rocket. About 80 minutes after departure, I returned, landing in front of a most enthusiastic and supportive crowd to claim the $10 million X PRIZE with Scaled’s distinguished and elated team. I can describe this incredible experience without the slightest fear of ruining it for you. It is not like a movie – it absolutely cannot be spoiled. Reflecting back on it, I am like many Astronauts I know, struck by one compelling thought – I can’t wait to go back.

a50322cca7bb.jpg 150x111 Peter Diamandis: Launching Commercial Space Flight: Part Five    Brian Binnie Makes History

Read this article:
Peter Diamandis: Launching Commercial Space Flight: Part Five — Brian Binnie Makes History